Call Now: (703) 796-9898
Call Us (703) 796-9898
corporate business people talking in conference room meeting image

EB-1A and EB-2 NIW for Entrepreneurs, Founders, Software Developers, & Business Professionals

← High-skilled immigration
Services › Business immigration › High-skilled immigration › Entrepreneurs, founders, software developers & business professionals

Accomplished professionals in business, technology, and entrepreneurship are not limited to employer-sponsored green card pathways. EB-1A and EB-2 NIW allow self-petition based on professional achievement — without requiring a job offer, a PERM labor certification, or your employer’s involvement. For founders, executives, software developers, and industry professionals whose track record speaks for itself, these pathways offer a route to permanent residence that you control.

Submit a free case evaluation

Why these profiles are commonly considered for self-petition

Both EB-1A and EB-2 NIW have evidentiary frameworks that can accommodate business and industry profiles. Commercial achievements, leadership roles, recognition in the field, and contributions to a sector or industry are among the categories of evidence that USCIS considers. Whether a particular record meets the applicable standard is a case-specific determination. The evidentiary profile for business and industry cases tends to be more individualized than for academic profiles — what applies to one candidate may not apply to another.

Leading or critical role

Founders, executives, senior engineers, and technical leads who have held leadership roles in well-known or distinguished organizations may be positioned to demonstrate a leading or critical role, a recognized criterion under EB-1A.

Original contributions of major significance

Significant innovations, proprietary technologies, novel methodologies, or business contributions that have had a demonstrable impact on a field or industry can serve as evidence of original contributions. Documentation of adoption, industry impact, or recognition by peers can be relevant considerations.

Media coverage and published material

Coverage in professional or major trade publications, industry press, or mainstream media about the individual — not merely about a product or company — can serve as evidence of recognition in the field.

Membership in associations requiring outstanding achievement

Membership in professional associations, boards, or organizations that require demonstrated outstanding achievement as a condition of admission may satisfy the membership criterion under EB-1A.

High remuneration relative to peers

Compensation — including salary, equity, and other forms of remuneration — that is significantly higher than others in the same field can serve as evidence of standing and recognition.

Prizes, awards, and recognition

Industry awards, competitive fellowship programs, recognized accelerators, and institutional prizes can contribute to EB-1A petitions when the competitive or selective nature of the recognition is properly documented.

EB-1A vs. EB-2 NIW — considerations for this profile

Both pathways are potentially available. The appropriate path depends on the specific record, the nature of the work, country of birth, and immigration timeline. The strategy discussion with your attorney is the right place to work through which option fits best.

EB-1A Extraordinary ability

EB-1A requires demonstrating sustained national or international acclaim — through recognized criteria such as leading or critical roles, original contributions to the field, media coverage, membership in selective associations, high remuneration, judging activity, and prizes or awards.

No degree requirement
EB-1 priority — generally shorter or no visa wait time compared to EB-2
Can accommodate a wide range of industry and business profiles
Higher evidentiary bar — requires a record of recognition that extends beyond a single employer or company
Not all criteria apply to every profile — authorship of scholarly articles, for example, may not be readily applicable

EB-2 NIW National interest waiver

NIW under Matter of Dhanasar requires showing that the proposed endeavor has substantial merit and national importance, that the petitioner is well-positioned to advance it, and that it is in the national interest to waive the job offer requirement. The NIW waives the job offer requirement — it does not waive the EB-2 category standard, which requires an advanced degree or exceptional ability.

EB-2 category requires an advanced degree or exceptional ability
Portability — approved petition is not tied to a specific employer
National interest argument for business profiles requires careful framing — the proposed endeavor must have a clear benefit to the United States beyond the individual petitioner

Ready to discuss whether EB-1A or NIW may be appropriate for your profile? Submit a free case evaluation and an attorney will follow up to schedule a strategy discussion.

Submit a free case evaluation

Key evidentiary criteria commonly applicable to these profiles

The following criteria are among those most frequently relevant to entrepreneur and business professional petitions. Evidentiary strategy is built around the specific strengths of a given record. Not all criteria apply to every profile — and some criteria common to academic cases, such as authorship of scholarly articles, may not apply readily here.

EB-1A criterion

Leading or critical role in distinguished organizations or establishments

Founders, C-suite executives, senior engineers, and technical or business leaders who have held a leading or critical role in a well-recognized or distinguished organization may be positioned to satisfy this criterion. The distinction of the organization — its revenue, market position, industry recognition, or scale — is a relevant consideration alongside the nature of the role.

EB-1A criterion

Original contributions of major significance to the field

Proprietary technologies, novel platforms, significant innovations, or business methodologies that have had a demonstrable impact on an industry or field can serve as evidence of original contributions. Documentation of adoption, industry impact, or recognition by peers can be relevant considerations.

EB-1A criterion

Published material about the individual in professional or major media

Coverage in major trade publications, industry press, or mainstream business media about the individual — distinct from coverage of a company or product — can satisfy this criterion. The nature and scope of coverage, and whether it reflects recognition of the individual’s standing in the field, are the key considerations.

EB-1A criterion

Judging the work of others in the field

Service as a judge, panelist, mentor, or reviewer in industry competitions, accelerator programs, investment committees, or professional boards could satisfy this criterion. The nature of the judging role and the standing of the program or organization are relevant factors.

EB-1A criterion

Membership in associations requiring outstanding achievement

Membership in selective professional organizations, industry bodies, or boards where outstanding achievement is a condition of admission may satisfy this criterion.

EB-1A criterion

High remuneration relative to others in the field

Compensation that is significantly higher than peers in the same field can serve as evidence of standing and recognition. For founders, equity valuation and investment terms may also be relevant. The comparison must be to peers in the same field and geographic market, not the general workforce.

NIW — Dhanasar prong 1

Substantial merit and national importance of the proposed endeavor

For business professionals and entrepreneurs, this prong may be supported by the economic, technological, social, or other impact of the proposed work — such as job creation, advancement of a critical industry sector, development of significant technology, contribution to U.S. competitiveness, environmental protection, national defense, education, or other areas of national concern. The argument must go beyond general commercial benefit to establish national importance.

NIW — Dhanasar prong 2

Well-positioned to advance the proposed endeavor

This prong is established through the petitioner’s specific track record — prior ventures, leadership roles, technical achievements, industry recognition, and professional qualifications. The petition support letter ties these credentials directly to the proposed plan.

NIW — Dhanasar prong 3

Beneficial to waive the job offer and labor certification requirements

For entrepreneurs and professionals whose work creates economic value, supports domestic industry, or advances fields of national importance, the case for waiving the job offer requirement can often be grounded in the broader benefit of the proposed endeavor to the United States.

Visa status considerations

Many entrepreneurs, founders, software developers, and business professionals in the United States are in nonimmigrant status — including, but not limited to, H-1B, L-1, O-1, or TN. Current visa status does not prevent pursuit of an EB-1A or NIW petition, but there are status-specific considerations that should be evaluated by an attorney before filing. The visa categories discussed below are illustrative only and are not intended to be a comprehensive list of all nonimmigrant statuses that may be relevant.

H-1B

H-1B considerations and AC21 benefits

Those in H-1B status should be aware that an approved I-140 petition can unlock meaningful benefits under AC21, including the ability to obtain post-sixth-year H-1B extensions in one-year increments while the green card process is pending.

L-1

L-1 status and the EB-1C pathway

L-1A visa holders — particularly those serving as executives or managers — may also be eligible for the EB-1C immigrant visa category, which is separate from EB-1A and NIW and requires employer sponsorship. Whether to pursue EB-1A or NIW as a self-petition alongside or instead of EB-1C is a strategic question that should be evaluated by an attorney.

O-1

Evidentiary overlap with EB-1A

Those in O-1 status who are considering EB-1A may find that the evidentiary record supporting the O-1 is relevant to the EB-1A petition, as both require demonstrating extraordinary ability or achievement. The overlap and appropriate sequencing should be evaluated by an attorney.

TN

TN status and immigrant intent

TN status is a nonimmigrant classification that does not carry dual intent protections. Filing an immigrant petition such as an I-140 can raise questions about immigrant intent that may affect TN status or re-entry at the border. These considerations should be evaluated by an attorney before filing.

All statuses

What follows an approved I-140

An approved I-140 petition establishes a priority date and confirms that the evidentiary standard for the relevant category has been met. Visa availability and the subsequent adjustment of status or consular processing steps depend on country of birth and other factors. The full pathway should be evaluated by an attorney.

Note on nonimmigrant visa context. The interaction between current nonimmigrant status and the green card process varies significantly by visa type, employer, and individual circumstances. These considerations should be evaluated by an attorney and should be raised during the strategy discussion.

Our approach to these cases

Our attorneys are experienced in assessing candidate profiles across a broad range of business and industry disciplines and helping to build petitions that reflect the significance of the professional record and the petitioner’s standing in the field.

Attorney oversight on every case

Your attorney is actively involved from evaluation through filing. You have direct access throughout the engagement to discuss strategy, review materials, or address any questions.

Strategic letter guidance

Your attorney provides strategic guidance on the content and framing of reference letters to ensure they are aligned with the evidentiary requirements of the petition. The engagement typically involves five to six reference letters per I-140 filing, plus a petition support letter.

Transparent fees, no surprises

All fees are disclosed upfront. Cases in this profile fall under the Industry / Professional fee tier. Full details are on the high-skilled immigration page.

Fee tier for this profile: Entrepreneur, founder, software developer, and business professional cases are handled under the Industry / Professional fee tier — $9,000 for a single petition (EB-1A or NIW) and $16,000 for a concurrent dual petition (EB-1A + NIW). Full fee details are on the high-skilled immigration page.

Frequently asked questions

I’m not an academic — can I still qualify for EB-1A or NIW?
Yes. Neither EB-1A nor NIW is limited to academics or researchers. Both categories are available to professionals across a wide range of fields, including business, technology, entrepreneurship, finance, and others. A well-documented record of professional achievement, leadership, recognition, and impact can support a strong petition.
Which is easier to get approved — EB-1A or NIW?
They’re evaluated under different legal standards, so it’s not a straightforward comparison. For business profiles in particular, the NIW’s national interest argument requires careful framing — establishing that the proposed work benefits the United States in a meaningful way beyond general commercial activity. Documentation prepared for one petition can often support the other, which is part of why concurrent filing is a common approach.
I’m a founder — does my company’s success count as evidence?
It can, but the focus needs to be on the individual, not just the company. Evidence of the petitioner’s specific role in founding, leading, or driving the company’s success — together with recognition of that role by others in the industry — is what USCIS evaluates. Company metrics, press coverage about the individual, and letters from investors, partners, or peers attesting to the individual’s contributions are among the types of evidence that may be relevant.
I’m a software developer or engineer — is EB-1A realistic for me?
It depends on the record. EB-1A is available to professionals in any field, including software and technology. Developers and engineers with a documented record of significant technical contributions, industry recognition, open-source impact, speaking engagements at major conferences, or leadership of significant technical programs may have a viable case. A case evaluation is the right starting point.
I’m on an L-1A. Should I pursue EB-1C through my employer or self-petition?
Both paths have different tradeoffs. EB-1C requires employer sponsorship and is tied to the sponsoring employer; a self-petition through EB-1A or NIW produces an approved I-140 that is portable and not dependent on continued employment. Whether one path, the other, or both in parallel makes sense is a strategic question best evaluated by an attorney.
Does my TN status create complications if I file an I-140?
TN status does not carry dual intent protections, so filing an immigrant petition can raise questions about nonimmigrant intent that may affect TN renewals or re-entry at the border. This should be evaluated by an attorney before filing.
Is it worth filing even if my employer is already sponsoring me for a green card?
Often, yes. A self-petition through EB-1A or NIW can run in parallel with an employer-sponsored petition and produces an approved I-140 that isn’t tied to your current employer. For nationals of high-backlog countries, EB-1A in particular may offer a meaningfully faster path to visa availability. And if your employment situation changes, a self-petitioned I-140 gives you flexibility that an employer-sponsored petition may not.

Submit a free case evaluation request

Fill out the form below and one of our attorneys will review your background and follow up to schedule a strategy discussion. Submitting this form does not create an attorney-client relationship.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Name(Required)
If applicable.
By submitting this form you consent to Goel & Anderson contacting you about your inquiry. Submission does not create an attorney-client relationship. Information shared is subject to our privacy policy.

Goel & Anderson makes no guarantee regarding approval, adjudication timing, or ultimate immigration outcome. USCIS adjudication is discretionary. This page is for general informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. Attorney advertising.

0 image Firm logo 1 image

Washington DC, Metro

1775 Wiehle Ave, Suite 200
Reston, VA 20190

India

603 East Court Building
Phoenix Market City, Viman Nagar

Phone

1 877 GOELLAW

© 2026 Goel & Anderson, LLC.
All rights reserved. Attorney advertising.